Talk:Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2

Fair use rationale for Image:Bookofshadows.jpg
Image:Bookofshadows.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Plot?
Why is there no plot section, or even the vaguest mention of anything that happened in the movie? I assume that something happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.125.218 (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I've significantly trimmed the plot summary and removed the tag regarding its length. It probably isn't a masterpiece, given I spliced a lot of previously unrelated paragraphs together before starting to cut, but it should do until somebody feels up to improving it. Two quick notes: If anyone has a more elegant way of handling that, please do. -Dapper cthulhu (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm aware that the "everything is backwards" theory seems to pop out of nowhere and crack the case as soon as it's mentioned. That's actually how fast it happens in the movie itself, apart from a brief obstacle where they have to "enter the keystrokes backwards" to play the video.
 * 2) I'm not sure I did the best job when I talked about the security at Jeff's house. I know the bridge was pre-existing and not really a security measure, but I lumped it in there anyway to mention the bridge without adding another sentence. I left the mention of the dog alarm because nobody hears it when Erica is missing, and because I'm guessing there's supposed to be significance in the pack of dogs sounding just like his alarm.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2000/2000st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Missing Detail
I have noted in the "Plot" section of the main page that an edit by user:2601:49:C301:4AFA:91C:64DC:6ACD:5DDE left out information. Specifically, in the eighth paragraph the text said Jeff becomes agitated and shouts to the group that nobody can leave because he will not blamed for the murders of the tourists. decides to call for help, but while looking for a telephone directory discovers dossiers on each of the tourists in Jeff's desk The name at the beginning of the second paragraph is missing. I have never seen the film, so I don't know what belongs there. I've modified the page to say ...he will not blamed for the murders of the tourists. Who?--editor left this name out decides to call for help, but while looking for a telephone directory discovers dossiers on each of the tourists in Jeff's desk This may not be the correct way to do this, but I'm not sure how else to address this. I've never encountered quite this situation before.

* Septegram * Talk * Contributions * 21:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)