Talk:Bradford Odeon

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bradford Odeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130816123553/http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/newvic.htm to http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/newvic.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120407015800/http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/odeon.htm to http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/odeon.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424004301/http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/newvi2.htm to http://www.kingsdr.demon.co.uk/cinemas/newvi2.htm
 * Added tag to http://www.theplacestation.org.uk/place/former-bradford-odeonnew-victoriagaumont

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Manchester Road or Street?
Two photos have Manchester Street. Manchester Road appears twice in the text. As this building has been demolished it is a bit difficult to check on maps! FrankSier (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I can find no trace of a Manchester Street in Bradford UK, and the only cited website for this building says Road, so I have changed the 2 picture captions to Road. FrankSier (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Naming & other confusion, split into 2 articles?
In this article, the building in Godwin Street is variously referred to as: - New Victoria - Odeon - Gaumont - The Gaumont as the Odeon - New Victoria / Gaumont

On Google Maps it is shown as: - Old Odeon Cinema Building

I think there needs to be more consistency/clarity.

And various other Odeons are referred to.

The article is about 2 different buildings. I suggest splitting into 2 articles.

If split, I think careful thought needs to go into what the names of the 2 articles will be.

If kept as one article I think it needs clarifying as to which bit of the article refers to which building.

FrankSier (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have moved the pictures, and most of the text, to 2 main sections, one for each building. FrankSier (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Further modification/updating to "Redevelopment ..." needed
For example: "After a gap of 45 years" and "current" are in the present article and I suggest these are modified to terms that do not go out of date (the gap is now presumably more than 45 years, and it is not obvious when the gap started). FrankSier (talk) 11:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)