Talk:Brahmajāla Sūtra

I've moved this from the spurious Pali title, which is absurd for a Mahayana text. Peter jackson (talk) 11:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps it should actually be under the Chinese title. Peter jackson (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I decided to maintain the Sanskrit title as-is, but add Chinese and Japanese titles as well, for reference. This is similar to how other articles are done, allowing for consistency. Thanks!  --Ph0kin (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * What about the fact that many/most/all scholars regard the Sanskrit title as spurious & this as being a Chinese work (or maybe Central Asian? Doesn't seem to be mentioned. Peter jackson (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)