Talk:Branle

Article source
Most of this text is from the excellent Cunnan article, which is licensed under GNU. Jokestress 02:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

The numerous bransles by Praetorious should be mentioned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.121.156 (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Expert Vandalism
The edit 06:43, 30 October 2014 by User:Jerome Kohl trashed an immense amount of technical detail as to the music, not available anyplace else on the web, in the name of demanding reference sources. This practice is counterproductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.193.44 (talk)
 * You are of course entitled to your opinion, but it is Wikipedia policy that all claims not of the "sky is blue" variety must be verified by a reliable source, and those were flagged for a very long time without anyone coming up with supporting sources. As for "trashing", all of those unlikely claims are still accessible in the edit history, from where they may be retrieved and restored to the article, if and when reliable sources for them have been found. I have made a good-faith effort, but have not succeeded in finding any. You may know of better places to look. Upon checking those edits from over a year ago, there were just three short and rather dubious claims removed. If you think removing misleading and probably inaccurate statements constitute vandalism, then I suggest you think again.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)