Talk:Bridge near Limyra

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  No images, any available?  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass : There are a few problems that should be addressed soon.  These include use of English measurements in addition to metric (should add), punctuation of metric units ( . not, ), some spacing problems (gaps).
 * a Pass : There are a few problems that should be addressed soon.  These include use of English measurements in addition to metric (should add), punctuation of metric units ( . not, ), some spacing problems (gaps).

Please continue to work on this article. Spevw (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done:
 * English measurements
 * punctuation of metric units
 * spacing (gaps). Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)