Talk:British Cavy Council

Untitled
This article is being questioned under the provisions of proposal Notability (organizations). However, these proposals seem to be aimed at discouraging articles based on subordinate units of national or international organisations. NB: "Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by a third party source." There is no question that BCC's scope is national. Reference may be found to it on the websites of many British cavy clubs and in British cavy periodicals, including the national monthly 'Cavies' magazine. Can the objector be more specific about his objection?


 * I agree - not sure why this was ever tagged? It is a national organisation, with a clearly defined supervisory and judicial role within a large British sub-cultural grouping, and there is no shortage of external references to be found on the internet at a glance. I suggest the 'notability' tag be removed. Chris Golds 16:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Questionable external link added
I question that the external link added in the edit 18:52, February 14, 2007 by 82.5.230.126 (Talk) meet the conditions in WP:EL. What do others think? Will (Talk - contribs) 07:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, this link doesn't really fit here, according to WP:EL. It would be appropriate to a new article called "List of British Cavy Clubs" or similar, but it does seem out of place here, as it adds nothing to the subject of the British Cavy Council, neither does the linked site have anything significant to say about the BCC. Timothy Titus  19:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Atlantis?
Um, that edit by 69.92.82.231... looks like balderdash, but I know nothing about cavies. --Suitov 22:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * That's the polite way of putting it. The Atlantis reference was a piece of silly vandalism, and has been removed by another editor. Timothy Titus  23:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Meat debate
I was sort of confused with the "cavies as meat debate"; it looks sort of like a coatrack, and that such discussion would belong in a different article. Propping up a discussion of the debate based off a single Telegraph article seems poor. L Faraone  02:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on British Cavy Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061028004938/http://www.shelfordfeast.co.uk:80/guineapig.html to http://www.shelfordfeast.co.uk/guineapig.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630115113/http://www.nationalcavyclub.co.uk:80/studreg.htm to http://www.nationalcavyclub.co.uk/studreg.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

References?
Added the unreferenced section template due to the fact the references section is empty. I'm assuming the information came from the pages in the external links shown on the page, is this the right template to be using if that's the case?Entwista (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)