Talk:British Emperor

Brytenwalda
No mention of this title in the article seems a little odd. 89.241.50.186 (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Forked Article
This article was forked out from the Emperor article for edits to the contents of this article before Revision of "British Emperor" as of 12:57, 14 March 2006 by user:Francis Schonken See Revision of "Emperor" as of 22:39, 11 March 2006 by user:Neddyseagoon

This note is so that if there is a copyright issue the text can be tracked back through the Emperor article --Philip Baird Shearer 18:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Imperium maius

 * See Talk:Emperor/Archive 1

Proposed titles for George III
Instead of putting Emperor of the Birtish and Irish and Emperor of the British and Hanoverian Dominions into this article, I would like to create a new one called "Proposed Imperial Titles for George III" or something. How does that sound? CharlesMartel 20:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)CharlesMartel
 * I'd go with just merging the two into this one, it would fit fine in the article as is without creating a seperate article.  At any rate the information would just work as well if it were mentioned in the George III article instead of a seperate article. Radagast83 06:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Horrible opening paragraph
The characterisation British Emperor (or: British Empress), that is: being British and also being Emperor/Empress can only be applied to very few people, as Britain's monarchs are indicated as king or queen (latin: rex/regina) in almost all cases.

My edit is tentative, though, but I felt it would look better than that. Snapdragonfly 11:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)