Talk:British Rail Class 121

Naming convention
There is a discussion about the naming convention to use for articles about British locomotive and multiple unit classes at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (British railway locomotive and multiple unit classes). Your comments are more than welcome. Thryduulf 22:27, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Only one is left in passenger service"?
What about the Arriva one that's just started on the Cardiff Bay shuttle? I have no local knowledge of that, but why isn't it being counted? Loganberry (Talk) 04:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

It's actually contradictory of itself. If you look, it says only one is left in passenger service and then goes on to talk about the one that ATW have just reintroduced. I'll change that. Worley-d 13:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Class 121 or 122?
Not to be picky or anything, but my railway enthusiast instinct tells me the green unit in the picture at the top of the page is a class 122 and not 121. Am I right? Tom walker (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Its definitely not got the right headcode box for a 121. Unless its been rebuilt with the wrong cab (parts from a 116 or 122?) it's not a 121... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.159.86 (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Rapists Train
I remember at one time the class was famous for having more poeple raped on it than any other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.234.159.97 (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons images
Hi. Just to let you know, the Commons category for Class 121s is now completely sorted by operator and livery. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

121032
No sources cite this as being used as a spares donor, therefore all references to it have been removed. Infact, it has seen service since the transfer to Chiltern. Lord Castellan Creed (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on British Rail Class 121. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131221005408/http://www.rssb.co.uk/RGS/Pages/MECHANICALANDELECTRICALCOUPLINGINDEX.aspx to http://www.rssb.co.uk/RGS/Pages/MECHANICALANDELECTRICALCOUPLINGINDEX.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703123005/http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk:80/about-us/our-train-fleet/ to http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/about-us/our-train-fleet/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131220185827/http://railcar.co.uk/type/121/121.html to http://railcar.co.uk/type/121/121.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)