Talk:Broadhurst Park/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 15:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

This has been waiting for a review far too long, so I'll take a look at it. Wizardman 15:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Here are the issues I found:
 * I don't see a need for the two fair use images, especially since the park has now been built and is now open. If you can provide a stronger claim then maybe one would be okay. ✅ I have removed the image of the current ground as a free image could be taken instead. I have kept the Ten Acres Lane photo as this stadium was never built and so can only be illustrated with the non-free image per fair use.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Double check that F.C. United is consistent throughout, as opposed to FC United. I caught one and fixed it myself, but there might've been some i missed. ✅  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * For the history section, perhaps make it a little clearer that we're talking about the history of the grounds themselves, rather than the stadium. Starting off with WWI-era history on something that broke ground in 2013 confused me at first. ✅ Renamed section and added opening sentence. If any more needs doing for this, let me know.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd link Section 106 to the appropriate act, so those unfamiliar (me) can understand what it is. ✅ linked to Town and Country Planning Act 1990  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * "Broadhurst Park also has a 3G pitch and two grass pitches adjacent to it, as training and community facilities" reword to "..as well as training and..." ✅  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Nothing too major to fix. I'll put the article on hold and will pass when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 17:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for the swift review. I have attempted to rectify all the issues. Hope you have a Happy New Year :)  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  18:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me, thanks. The copyedits after yours helped as well with a couple sentences that, while I didn't note them, were a bit iffy. As such I'll pass the article. Wizardman  22:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)