Talk:Bronze Age India

Untitled
I don't think these two articles should merge. There is a lot more to bronze age india than just the Indus Civilization (which spanned Afghanistan, Pakistan and some parts of India). The rest of India (the east, south etc) would not be included.
 * Instead of merging the article should be extended to include more details from available sources.


 * Never merge, Bronze Age India include more than IVC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.117.193.50 (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 8 August 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: procedural close: including discussion in a more highly-participated-in one (Talk:Iron_Age_in_India). Consensus there applies here.  Dr Strauss   talk   16:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Bronze Age India → South Asian Bronze Age – The reason is very simple. Some Indian wikipedia members are attempting to shove there own nationalistic Indian pseudohistory onto wikipedia by intentionally mixing up South Asian history with Indian history. SOUTH ASIA refers to the regions (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) while INDIA refers to the Republic of India now. We're talking about the region of South Asia, not India. Hence forth for the sake of neutrality, this should be changed to South Asian Iron Age, just like South Asian Stone Age and South Asian Bronze Age which was again reverted to Bronze Age of India. This is totally unacceptable how some Indian wiki members are going around on wikipedia and deleting South Asia and replacing it with India or Ancient India or Indian subcontinent, all either fake terms or obsolete terms. Kindly consider moving to South Asian Iron Age. PAKHIGHWAY (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC) --PAKHIGHWAY (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943  (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose per user:Capitals00 at Requested move 8 August 2017. — usernamekiran (talk)  03:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose for now at least. This is explicitly party of a promotion of a POV. There may be a case for some of the foreshadowed moves, but I preach caution. Andrewa (talk) 01:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: what is the commonly used term in WP:Reliable Sources produced by archaeologists studying this period? Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.