Talk:Brotherhood of St Laurence

This seems (still), to be a blatant advertorial for the BSL; an organisation that has been surrounded by controversy over the last twenty years, particularly about its real-estate ethics in Melbourne. Can I get a hand in fixing the article to get a more balanced view. (I'm not a fan of the BSL, so I want someone impartial to run their eye over it). 203.219.193.12 (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * It's definitely true that the page is written as advertorial content. I've at least slapped a tag up at the top as a start. Though I hate tagging and leaving, I may have to leave it at that for now since I've not found any good summary references describing the controversies in an initial search. T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 03:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)