Talk:Bugs Bunny/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Orson12345 (talk · contribs) 16:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I have read through the article, checked all the images used, and looked through the sources. I found two issues that need to be resolved.

The first was located in the “Development” section. The paragraph, “The rabbit comes back in Prest-O Change-O (1939), directed by Chuck Jones, where he is the pet rabbit of unseen character Sham-Fu the Magician. Two dogs, fleeing the local dogcatcher, enter his absent master's house. The rabbit harasses them but is ultimately bested by the bigger of the two dogs. This version of the rabbit was cool, graceful, and controlled. He retained the guttural laugh but was otherwise silent.”

Contained a, which I agreed with, the wording was a bit confusing, but it was an easy fix of wording, so I just fixed it myself. Of course, if you think it could be worded better, by all means, change it to what you think sounds better.

The second is located in the “ Personality and catchphrases” section. It contains a lack of citations banner, in which I agree with. The first paragraph of this section, “Bugs Bunny is characterized as being clever and capable of outsmarting almost anyone who antagonizes him, including Elmer Fudd, Yosemite Sam, Tasmanian Devil, Marvin the Martian, Wile E. Coyote, Gossamer, Witch Hazel, Rocky and Mugsy, The Crusher, Beaky Buzzard, Willoughby, Count Bloodcount, Daffy Duck and a host of others. The only one to consistently beat Bugs is Cecil Turtle, who defeats Bugs in three consecutive shorts based on the premise of the Aesop fable The Tortoise and the Hare. In a rare villain turn, Bugs turns to a life of crime in 1949's Rebel Rabbit, taking on the entire United States government by vandalizing monuments in an effort to prove he is worth more than the two-cent bounty on his head; while he succeeds in raising the bounty to $1,000,000, the full force of the military ends up capturing Bugs and sending him to Alcatraz.” Contains no sources supporting this information, the second paragraph also needs more citations of sources.

Those were the only issues that I found that need to be fixed in order for this article to be approved as a good article. The wording in the article is consistent and understandable, and contains a very broad scope of information. I believe it lacks images, but that’s a personal preference, it’s not required at all. Once those two issues are fixed I believe this article is ready to be approved. Have a nice day! -- Orson12345 (Talk • Contribs) 16:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I got the rest. Thanks. Sportsfangnome (talk) 23:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m going to put the review on hold, That’ll give you or anyone else a week to make the changes. Have a nice day and good luck! :)  Orson12345 (Talk • Contribs) 20:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)