Talk:Byron Moreno

Blatantly obvious flame
"Once his official picture was found on the Internet, with his characteristic sleepy eyes, he was victim of an intensive and humorous (but at times also hateful) campaign of defacing. [1]"

What's the point of this? I'm pretty sure that encyclopedias should not contain blatantly obvious insults to people. I'm removing this.

--Jayohz 17:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

General
Oh for heaven's sake, after fully reading this article, it truly reeks of bitterness of Italian fans. I couldn't give a damn whether or not South Korea deserved that win or Italy deserved that loss but let's not bring that ugly crap into our beloved wikis.

I'll leave the "alleged" business there but I do believe you require a citation. It's funny how whoever wrote the "blatantly obvious flame paragraph" (see above) had that cited but didn't cite the following section. Lovely.--Jayohz 18:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Am finding sources -- citations are very much available. --TheProject 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, the amount of references used is unbelieveable. Excellent work.--Jayohz 16:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

General
Oh for heaven's sake, after fully reading this article, it truly reeks of bitterness of Italian fans. I couldn't give a damn whether or not South Korea deserved that win or Italy deserved that loss but let's not bring that ugly crap into our beloved wikis.

I'll leave the "alleged" business there but I do believe you require a citation. It's funny how whoever wrote the "blatantly obvious flame paragraph" (see above) had that cited but didn't cite the following section. Lovely.--Jayohz 18:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Am finding sources -- citations are very much available. --TheProject 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, the amount of references used is unbelieveable. Excellent work.--Jayohz 16:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Wow. This article smacks of bias. And I'm not even Italian. There were a lot of dubious decisions made in this match, the way the article now reads suggests that the Italians had no right to be upset, which is quite simply not the case. To highlight the two most controversial incidents, the Totti sending off was very debatable, because contact was clearly made, and Tommasi's goal being called back for offside was bizarre to say the least, seeing as it wasn't offside.

Also, a lot of these references are un-encyclopedic. Even if it's from CNN-SI, a 'mailbag' of people angry about a call doesn't meet WP:BLP and is really just grasping at straws. I'm going to change some wording to make this article at least slightly factual. The point of Wikipedia isn't to push your own opinion, it's to provide information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wannabe rockstar (talk • contribs) 13:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Melonbarmonster2's violation of 3RR rule
User:Melonbarmonster2 has reverted other users' edits 9 times in the main article on July 3, without any discussion in this talk page. I politely warn that this is a violation of the 3RR rule. Hkwon (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know what 3rr is but you might want to try reading WP:3rr before you start accusing people of violating it.Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Destroyer
The guy totally destroyed Italy at 2002. I believe he fixed the match, given the scandals after the World Cup. And I am from Greece, not Italy. --Rigas Papadopoulos • Talk to me • My work • 12:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Consensus
By my edits I was hoping to change the way the article was written because I think it has some subliminal messages. For instance, I was attempting to edit how the offside is described, because many people agree it wasn’t offside (and by reviewing the game it can be made clear that it probably wasn’t offside), whilst that article bit makes it look like it was offside. So I wanted to add a part that said that it probably wasn’t. Same for the dive, since there was evident contact. Lastly, I also wanted to report the fact about the fouls by the South Korean team.IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Who are many people? You need to provide WP:reliable sources and keep WP:NPOV. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Many people such as respected football pundits, football fan base, and the general eye because I think it’s clear that it is not offside. The contact with Totti was clear. I hope that’s enough. I’m trying to keep the neutral point of view IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

But I want to make the changes like you saw them only respecting the policies I see now IdkImNotCreative (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

I’d really like to hear how you would edit it by these new informations I gave you, as I trust you by your experience IdkImNotCreative (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Because, as I said, I believe there is these things missing in the article that would fully complete it. IdkImNotCreative (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)