This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
I'm pretty sure this was intended as a rhetorical question, but to the IP who asked so his OWN WORDS, aren't evidence enough? No, actually, a video of a government meeting is not enough - see WP:BLPPRIMARY. And it certainly doesn't cover the original research like Contrary to assertions made by Wilson.... If you want to include this, you need reliable, independent sources (see WP:REPUTABLE) that cover Wilson's position on this bill. If they don't think it's significant enough to be worth writing about, then neither does Wikipedia. Egsan Bacon (talk) 11:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not certain I agree with the interpretation that the meeting protocol (video format or not) can not be used as source for Wilson's position on the matter, as it is an official and public document. Presenting the motivations given, preferably as a direct quotation, would not be a misuse in the sense outlined in WP:BLPPRIMARY. What the editor should not do and also why the reversal was correct, is the OR and Synthesis introduced. Another point though, how relevant/important is the stance on Right to repair? Is it more of a trivia addition, or something potentially carer defining? That should be considered for whether or not it should be mentioned in the article. BP OMowe (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
