Talk:COVID-19 lockdowns/Archive 1

Canada's status?
Does anyone have details to include Canada's status? Torfrid (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * We definitely have had measures in place. I don't know why we're not in this article, we definitely should be.76.71.47.122 (talk) 05:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Germany
There is wrong information about Germany in the list: The lockdown is nationwide until May 3rd Just don't know how to modify the table. --Mateus2019 (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Thanks. --Shawnqual (talk) 08:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 3 May 2020
Curfews and lockdowns related to the COVID-19 pandemic → COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns – This article applies to curfews, quarantines, and lockdowns. The absence of quarantines from the title was odd, since it's a lot more common than "curfews", which is for restrictions that only apply during a certain time of day (not that common during this pandemic). On reflection, I think "lockdowns" adequately covers the scope of the article without needing the other two. The "related to the" formulation is also not needed, given the pretty direct connection between the pandemic and the lockdowns for it. This new title is WP:CONCISE and direct. Note: Should 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic be renamed to COVID-19 pandemic, I intend for this RM to be for the title COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns and may refactor it to such.Update: now done &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 05:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support as nom. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 05:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Yes, it must be removed to COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, given a positive consensus is reached for COVID-19 pandemic renaming (which i think will happen). The title is currently overly long, and the new title would also be in alignment with other pandemic articles.-- Shawnqual (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Yes, it must be removed to '''COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns' Reason: the general term is lockdown and NOT curfew GeorgeDorgan (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Curfew isn't used in relation with the COVID-19 lockdowns and the new title makes more sense to me.00:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Sdkb, there is likely to be no opposition to this. When you do make the move, please make sure to fix the double redirect. See: WP:A2R Shawnqual (talk) 13:44, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 27 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to COVID-19 lockdowns (closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan B....   It’s all coming to me till the end of time  15:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns → Lockdowns related to COVID-19 – I think the new title sounds better. My second choice of title would be COVID-19 lockdowns. Interstellarity (talk) 16:54, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Support a page move but prefer the second choice COVID-19 lockdowns. Both the current name and first proposed title are more wordy than they need to be. SpookiePuppy (talk) 19:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support but for second choice only. I think word "pandemic" needs to be removed because it is redundant. Lockdowns related to COVID-19 can be auto-redirect to the current or second propose title. 36.68.186.36 (talk) 22:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support but for COVID-19 lockdowns. Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 02:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Also Support for Lockdowns related to COVID-19 redirect to COVID-19 lockdowns. Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 00:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support agree move to COVID-19 lockdowns. Also agree that Lockdowns related to COVID-19 can be an auto-redirect to the renamed page. Edl-irishboy (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per everyone else. Love of Corey (talk) 08:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)