Talk:Cabbage moth

I sorced this! Wipsenade (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review
I reviewed this article and found it comprehensive, all I did was move around some subsections to make the article look cleaner and flow smoother. Iginsberg (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I fixed a few grammatical errors I found throughout. Also, I only edited through the section on Animal Behavior. Qualitatively, your section on life history can be retooled to improve its legibility. The sub section on caterpillars is really hard to read and is cluttered. I don't know if this is your writing style, but some of the sections feel "unoriginal." You may find it beneficial to rewrite some of these technical passages in a way that is more distinctly you. Also, cut down some of the information. The section on Animal Behavior is also undeveloped. Ecampell22 (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review 2
Hey its Emily! I did a general grammar/spell check edit of your article, and improved some syntax where I thought the flow was a little broken. I also changed "recorded food plants" to "food resources" to comply with Wikipedia standards, and included a sentence about these being the recorded ones. Just a heads up, you still have a citation missing early on in your article- I'm not sure where it came from, so I can't add it, but I also don't want to delete it yet!

Emilykh26 (talk) 23:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Moid.ali: I added all new content to the page aside from the existing section on "Recorded food plants". My upload was originally recoded as coming from an IP address since I was not logged in. I copy and pasted my entry again once logged in to ensure that it is recoded as my contribution.