Talk:Cambridge Animation Systems

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Cambridge Animation Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nyanko.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/chamb/drawn.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nyanko.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/chamb/drawn2.html
 * Added tag to http://www.productionig.com/contents/works_sp/57_/s08_/000762.html|title=Production
 * Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cam-ani.co.uk/ with https://web.archive.org/web/20140516191519/http://cam-ani.co.uk/ on http://www.cam-ani.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Add the Filmography section back!
Seriously! I've put A LOT OF EFFORT into this page! NOW it's not INFORMATIVE without that Filmography section, plus there's PLENTY of sources in there! Just add it back right now! 154.68.5.136 (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. It was removed repeatedly after added back in, and there is clearly a disagreement about if it should be included or not. Until this is resolved, please don't use use this template, as it is meant for uncontroversial requests. DannyS712 (talk) 04:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Someone just REMOVED that section for being "unsourced"! It's NOT unsourced! There's PLENTY of sources in it! 158.181.42.97 (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There are some sources, but the sources aren't sufficient to support the information you added. By my quick count, you've provided supporting references for about 20 of the 100+ list items you added. For this information to be considered verifiable, you need to provide supporting references for all of the list entries - whether that's individual references for each list item, or one reference that names a bunch at once (or a combination of the two). If this is based on your own research, that's prohibited under Wikipedia's policy on original research. Courtesy ping to User:Trivialist that this discussion is here. Thanks, &#8209;&#8209; El Hef  ( Meep? ) 15:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Aside from the low amount of references, a wall of TV shows and movies that used Cambridge isn't very helpful. Please see WP:INDISCRIMINATE: "...merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." If you want to add a paragraph listing a few examples or prominent uses, that would be better. Also, it's not typical for articles about software like this to list every title that it's used in, and putting "A LOT OF EFFORT" is not reason enough to include something in an article. And, finally, IP hopping and re-adding the list without comment or explanation isn't the most polite type to edit. Trivialist (talk) 16:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)::
 * Also, you wouldn't happen to be a certain Nate S., would you? Trivialist (talk) 16:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * It IS very helpful! It helps LOTS OF PEOPLE know WHAT movies and programs it was used on! And it's NOT a "low amount" of references, I SAID there's PLENTY of them! DO YOU NOT READ what's NEXT to MOST of the friggin' TITLES?! HUH?! 93.143.157.233 (talk) 20:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yup, it's Nate. Also, out of 121 titles, there were only 35 references. Trivialist (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)