Talk:Canon EOS 20D

Rename
I intend to rename this page to Canon EOS 20D and redirect this page there (which is a reversal of the current situation). According to http://www.canoneos.com there is no - in the name. The same goes for Canon_EOS-300D, Canon_EOS-350D and Canon_EOS-10D. Any objections? Jkruis 21:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

go for it. --Kenliu 00:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Swapping in progress (see Help:Renaming_%28moving%29_a_page):
 * Canon_EOS_20D moved to Canon_EOS_20D_tmp
 * requested deletion for Canon_EOS_20D
 * moved article. Done!

GFDL Product Shot
Any objections to using a GFDL product shot?

It would probably be either Image:Canon-20D.jpg, Image:Cut out view 01.png, or Image:Cut out view 03.png.

-Fadookie Talk 13:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Wireless
"Canon Wireless File Transmitter WFT-E1/E1A for fast file transfer to a remote file server, either through an ethernet cable or a Wi-Fi  network." Wireless transfers over an ethernet cable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.193.52.14 (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

20Da noise problems?
Hi to all. About the 20Da, reviewers seem to think that the noise of the 20Da is generally lower than in the 20D, as in the Review by Jerry Lodriguss, thus contradicting what is said in the article. So I'm changing that part. By converse, it is true that the camera doesn't perform up to somebody's expectations, but this depends on the fact that you can have a better transmission of the H-α line with a custom-made filter. I'm removing also the part saying that the 20Da needs an IR filter to take normal pictures, since it is untrue as said here. The whole purpose of the 20Da is to give an acceptable transmission of the H-α line for astrophotography without compromising the ability of taking daylight pictures: this is the reason its filter is not the best possible for astrophotography. It is true that the filter modification causes a very small change in color balance, but I can't find a source for it. Filipporiccio (talk) 09:45, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

In Popular Culture: Desert Bus for Hope IV
Why do people keep taking this down? This is a legitimate reference to a popular culture reference. During the entirety of the near-six-day broadcast there were not fewer than 1500 people watching with a peak of around 3500 active viewers. Does this not count as popular enough to warrant a reference. A legitimate reference was also provided of a capture of said broadcast period. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugetsu37 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Even though it is an event that happened, it does not mean that it has to be included in this particular article. Please note that that content does not follow what should be added as a reference in popular culture as per Wikipedia:Popular Culture. There are no reliable sources to the reference (not to say it didn't happen). The subject, Canon, has not acknowledged that reference. And, no real world events would be affected by the reference.-- ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 12:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC)