Talk:Canterbury United Dragons

Fair use rationale for Image:CULogo.jpg
Image:CULogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.1)
Quote: Originally Posted by henryo Did anyone noticed that Canterbury United has actually played 12 home games in 2004/05 season? The same is also confirmed at RSSSF.com.

Is this a mistake? Was thinking that each team should play up to a max. of 11 games at home during a 21-game season.

Have emailed NZFC.CO.NZ since last year but no firm reply yet, although it was mentioned that "they did play Auckland in Nelson that year which would have been counted as a home game for Canterbury (in Round 17 which they lost 0-3)".

Can anyone help?

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.2)
At the end of 2007/08 (4th season), where every team should have played equal number (42) of Home/Away games, Canterbury will again play 1 more home game than others, while Waikato play 1 less.

It was the same case at the end of 2005/06 (2nd season), where all else played 21 Home/Away, Canterbury played 22 while Waikato played just 20 at Home.

Even if their game with Auckland is switched, Waikato would have still played 1 less Home Game, while Auckland played 1 more instead.

So I guess there're more errors in the 2004/05 fixtures, or even 2005/06?