Talk:Capacity utilization

The definition of the utilization rate given in the utilization rate article is false - I suggest that a redirect be inserted to this article, which discusses the measurement of the rate anyhow.

User:Jurriaan


 * Capacity Utilization can also be how much a person is utilized in a working shift. It is the normal question of: "Was there work for 8 hours"? If there was work for 8 hours and the employee had been working for 8 hours then his capacity utilization is 100%. If the employees's work exceeds more than 8 hours and goes on working for another 4 hours to complete the work then the capacity utilization is 150%. However, the efficiency would be lower when compared to the capacity utilization. Thus, this would also draw a difference between efficiency and utilization.--Samuelco (talk) 01:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Dr. Bitros's comment on this article
Dr. Bitros has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

"This lemma should be extended to cover all aspects of the effects of the intensity of utilization on the wear and tear of equipment, and hence its need maintenance. In doing, so one would be obliged also to extend considerably the selection of the references."

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Bitros has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:


 * Reference : Bitros, George C., 2009. "The Theorem of Proportionality in Mainstream Capital Theory: An Assessment of its Conceptual Foundations," MPRA Paper 17436, University Library of Munich, Germany.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 11:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Capacity utilization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060108092613/http://www.pitt.edu:80/~tgrawski/paper99/rawski-melbourne.htm to http://www.pitt.edu/~tgrawski/paper99/rawski-melbourne.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060315003307/http://homepage.newschool.edu:80/~AShaikh/measuring%20capacity.pdf to http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/measuring%20capacity.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060315003307/http://homepage.newschool.edu:80/~AShaikh/measuring%20capacity.pdf to http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/measuring%20capacity.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913092707/http://cds.edu/download_files/334.pdf to http://www.cds.edu/download_files/334.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)