Talk:Cardiff Castle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ColonelHenry (talk · contribs) 03:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

I look forward to reviewing this article. I expect to complete my review within 48 hours. --ColonelHenry (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * prose flows well and is both concise and informative
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * this article is very well supported by by solid academic references, periodical articles, and governmental reports.
 * C. No original research:
 * I do not see any "original research" concerns.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * this article is comprehensive in its coverage of the subject and its history
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * no bias detected at all.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * In the last two years, only minor vandalism. I do not see any content disputes that became edit wars.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * no copyvio issues, images are appropriately creditited and tagged.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratulations to preparing an comprehensive and excellent article that deserves Good Article Status.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratulations to preparing an comprehensive and excellent article that deserves Good Article Status.
 * Congratulations to preparing an comprehensive and excellent article that deserves Good Article Status.