Talk:Casualty loss

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge “Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3) into this article[edit]

I looked over the article “Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3) and thought, man, that name is long and awkward and isn't this known as casualty loss? Lo and behold, Casualty loss is an article already in existence. I think “Other Casualty” under Internal Revenue Code § 165 (c)(3) should be merged into this article. It has some good content on the revenue procedures/rulings. After the merge, we can put a redirect to this article.EECavazos (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete.EECavazos (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize?[edit]

I'm not sure but casualty loss sounds like something that exists throughout the world rather than just the USA. If so, then the article should be expanded on those lines. If the topic is very common then the article's priority should go higher. If the impact section is expanded to show that casualty loss is not esoteric and is in demand by the common person, then the priority should then go even higher.EECavazos (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]