Talk:Catastrophe (2015 TV series)

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Kent

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Source for ratings citations[edit]

The ratings numbers were flagged as "citation needed". I added a citation for BARB (Broadcasters' Audience Research Board), the primary source of TV ratings for the UK. The BARB publishing guidelines (http://www.barb.co.uk/about-us/barb-publishing-guidelines/) state: "Data available to the public on the BARB website can be published without a BARB publishing licence, although reproduction must be credited accordingly." As the ratings numbers are available to the public (I got them by accessing the web site from the US with no special account access) and suitable credit has been supplied, the publishing requirements are fulfilled.

To retrieve the ratings for any week, select only Channel 4 (SD+HD) in the channel listing on the left, then pick the appropriate year, month, and week on the right. Weeks that straddle a month boundary are in the end month, not the start month.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdulcey (talk • contribs) 15:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why nothing telling readers the theme of the show?[edit]

@Jim Michael and Scribolt: can you help? I came here to find out more about what the show is about. There's a line in the lead which doesn't help, and the episode summaries, but no summary. I found two recent Guardian reviews that might help.[1][2] Doug Weller talk 13:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Jim Michael (talk) 12:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'series' or 'season'?[edit]

The opening paragraphs mention second 'series', third and fourth 'series'. Shouldn't this be 'season'? Or is this a Britishism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.1.118.146 (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC) --Rymanes (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Series is British English for what Americans call a season. Jim Michael (talk) 12:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final episode synopsis[edit]

The description of the last scene, "The couple swim in the sea", is not really an adequate summary. As this article argues, it's a hugely important and ambiguous scene. At the very least, the episode summary needs to mention the warning sign, which Rob saw but Sharon did not. --Viennese Waltz 12:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly four years later, I felt exactly the same and made the changes before thinking to check the talk page... Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]