Talk:Cation–π interaction

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Cation–pi interaction → Cation–pi bond – The cation-pi interaction is as much a chemical bond as the hydrogen bond, and consequently should be called as such. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Left a note about this at WT:CHEMISTRY. Jenks24 (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep present name – the term interaction is common with these weak forces; other examples include pi-pi interactions (a.k.a. &pi;–stacking) and dipole-dipole interactions. Further, the hydrogen bond is a special case in that it is unusually strong for an intermolecular interaction.  If the hydrogen bond were discovered now I believe that it is likely that the word bond would not be used in its name, but the name is well established and isn't going to change.  As a chemist, I would say that the connotations of the term 'bond' make it unsuitable for describing a cation-pi interaction.  EdChem (talk) 11:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * And as an additional comment, the sources mostly use the current name only. -- Extra   999  (Contact me) 11:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

SI Units
To keep within Wiki's Style Manual, SI units should really be used. I haven't made any changes since getting appropriate images could be tricky and I don't want parts of the article in Joules but still using the png and tif images ....

However, it ought to be fixed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Units_of_measurement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.153.37 (talk) 21:51, 26 December 2012 (UTC)