Talk:Celebrity/Archives/2015

Sentence makes no sense....
The sentence "Though become the commonplace for celebrities to place their name with endorsements onto products just for quick money." makes no sense.

Would anyone care to take a guess at what this is supposed to mean and correct it...? This is the second sentence/paragraph under the "Entrepreneurship and endorsements" section. ````

' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmeades (talk • contribs) 11:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Really bad article
I did some editing on this article a while back and tried to introduce some history and some globalisation but it has not improved since then. It seems that people find it really hard to think of celebrity outside their own time and place. I really don't know what to suggest to rescue this page. Btljs (talk) 18:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Globalise
WikiEditorial101 removed the Globalize hatnote so I just want to explain why I put it there and why I think it should still be there. The section "Becoming a celebrity" which I had to add "in the US" to because it deals entirely with the US needs balancing with other countries or regions of the world. "Wealth" is entirely about rich US celebrities. These form about half of the page and, while the other sections are more balanced, they still have too many US orientated examples (not necessarily US celebrities but a US pov of who is famous).

I also think that the article is too current, which sounds weird, but there are celebrities who transcend both their time and their genre and you can't really know who they are until some time has passed (you can guess some though). Marylin Monroe, Charlie Chaplin, Mohatma Ghandi, John F Kennedy, Pelé, Alfred Hitchcock, Che Guevara, Sachin Tendulkar, Eva Perón, Rudolf Nureyev etc. who show a much wider definition of celebrity than that currently give in the page. Btljs (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)