Talk:Central Vermont Railway

Untitled
The CV is listed on both Template:US class 1 and Template:US class 2. Which is correct? slambo 12:28, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)


 * Not sure yet, but it's certainly possible that BOTH have been true at different times. In cases like that, what do we do?  I lean towards listing in just class 1 in that case. &mdash;Morven 19:56, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)


 * Well, the nature of Class 1 means that at some point those railroads were Class 2. Likewise with Class 2 vs. 3.  I would agree that the railroad should be listed on the highest class rating that it has qualified for.  slambo 20:50, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Related railroads

 * Boston and Maine Railroad
 * Burlington and Lamoille Railroad
 * Burlington and Lamoille Valley Railroad
 * Canadian National Railway
 * Centmont Corporation
 * Central Vermont Railroad
 * Central Vermont Railway
 * Consolidated Railway
 * Grand Trunk Railway
 * Missisquoi Railroad
 * Missisquoi Valley Railway
 * Montpelier and White River Railroad
 * Montreal and Province Line Railway
 * Montreal and Vermont Junction Railway
 * Montreal and Vermont Railroad
 * Montreal, Portland and Boston Railway
 * New London Northern Railroad
 * Brattleboro and Whitehall Railroad
 * Ware River Railroad
 * West River Railroad
 * Rutland Railroad
 * Addison County Railroad
 * Addison Railroad
 * Bennington and Rutland Railway
 * Harlem Extension Railroad
 * Montreal and Plattsburg Railroad
 * New York, Boston and Montreal Railway
 * Ogdensburgh and Lake Champlain Railroad
 * Ogdensburgh and Lake Champlain Railway
 * Rutland and Burlington Railroad
 * Western Railroad
 * Stanstead, Shefford and Chambly Railroad
 * Sullivan County Railroad
 * Vermont and Canada Railroad
 * Vermont and Massachusetts Railroad
 * Vermont Central Railroad
 * Vermont Valley Railroad
 * Waterloo and Magog Railway

Logo
The Central Vermont Railway had a logo symilar to that of the Canadian National Railway (, but using CV Peter Horn 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)) Can anybody find it to include it in the article? Peter Horn 03:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Yes, the most recent logo used should be used and should fall under fair use.173.110.59.190 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

70 year gap
There's very detailed info from the 19th Century but nothing from the 1920s until CN sold the line in 1995. There should be something atleast about dieselization, the GT Corporation or shipping conections. 173.110.59.190 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Inline Citations????
Almost none of this material is referenced...
 * Risk Engineer (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)