Talk:Cephalonomancy

So, are we keeping this article or not?
I spotted this substub on recent changes more than two weeks ago. I flagged it for speedy, as it was nothing more than a dicdef, but the anonymous creator of the page deleted the template. I could have reverted at the time, but instead I left a message on his/her talk page encouraging further contributions. Nothing came of it, hence the second flag for speedy.

If this is not a speedy delete candidate, then I'll list it on VfD, but does everyone who keeps restoring the page really see it growing into much more than it is now? A web search turns up nothing more than dicdefs; the divination article is encouraging people by creating red softlinks to such articles. --Ardonik 19:17, 2004 Aug 4 (UTC)

Waterproof skulls, ambergris, and set-in frags
Keep the article. That other creatures like to see human skulls has already been well-established as a perception and as a hedge against being overwhelmed by 'all other species' --  if ambergris holds fragrance why might it also hold images as a sort of whale-specific endeavor? We've all read about the bowl-cut hair-care technique. [This is and yet is not a joke.] .beadtot@AOL

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cephalonomancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205235348/http://www.webspinning.com.au/home/lambertj/public_html/c.man.html to http://www.webspinning.com.au/home/lambertj/public_html/c.man.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)