Talk:Changi Airport/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nigos (talk · contribs) 10:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

1. Is it well written?

 * Prose is clear and concise

2. Is it verifiable?

 * No citation needed tags. I'll have to read it further to see if the article is well-sourced
 * No copyvios

3. Broad coverage

 * The article talks about the main topic without veering off

4. Neutrality

 * The article is neutral

5. Is it stable?

 * Yes. There isn't any recent edit warring.

6. Illustrations

 * Yes. There are enough of them. One picture of low quality needs to be changed.

Comments

 * File:Changi Airport MRT.jpg could be replaced by a better picture, such as this. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Some of the citations are improperly formatted. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Fixed this. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thus should be a quick fail. Missing sources all over....whole sections need verification and is why the last GA did not work.-- Moxy 🍁 14:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Ho0w are we going with this review. I agree with that the sourcing is poor (accidents in particular need sourcing). AIRcorn (talk) 08:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Fail for now. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 12:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: Nigos did not actually adjust the article talk page to fail this nomination, so I'm taking that step now; as both Moxy and Aircorn have noted, there are severe sourcing issues, with entire sections being unreferenced. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)