Talk:Changi Airport/GA3

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nigos (talk · contribs) 10:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good article criteria[edit]

1. Is it well written?[edit]

Prose is clear and concise

2. Is it verifiable?[edit]

~~No citation needed tags.~~ I'll have to read it further to see if the article is well-sourced
No copyvios

3. Broad coverage[edit]

The article talks about the main topic without veering off

4. Neutrality[edit]

The article is neutral

5. Is it stable?[edit]

Yes. There isn't any recent edit warring.

6. Illustrations[edit]

Yes. There are enough of them. One picture of low quality needs to be changed.

Comments[edit]

File:Changi Airport MRT.jpg could be replaced by a better picture, such as this. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the citations are improperly formatted. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed this. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thus should be a quick fail. Missing sources all over....whole sections need verification and is why the last GA did not work.--Moxy 🍁 14:19, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nigos and Feinoa: Ho0w are we going with this review. I agree with Moxy that the sourcing is poor (accidents in particular need sourcing). AIRcorn (talk) 08:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fail for now. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 12:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Nigos did not actually adjust the article talk page to fail this nomination, so I'm taking that step now; as both Moxy and Aircorn have noted, there are severe sourcing issues, with entire sections being unreferenced. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]