Talk:Chemistry.com

Stub Class
I inserted a generic stub class parameter for the time being. I'm surprised this article hadn't already existed. Keithbrooks 10:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Reliable Sources
This article needs some references to reliable sources, per WP:RS and WP:V. – ukexpat (talk) 19:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

And, on the subject of sources, the link to "The Great Mate Debate" is broken. DMJ001 (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Criticism
This section seems to violate WP:NOR. I will leave it for the time being with a citation needed tag, but because of the nature of the section, I feel that it should be held to a stricter standard and not allowed to sit around uncited. It should be removed if no citation can be found. 173.76.204.216 (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Details of method? Proof?
I recently read in the news (sorry, it was weeks ago, so I can't cite it) that none of the online dating sites (eHarmony included) have proven any more successful than any other method of meeting people. As chemistry.com appears to be an online dating site like eHarmony, and claims to be backed up by science (see Helen Fisher's 2008 TED talk for example, which led me to believe it was a research project rather than a dating site), then it should be willing to explain its methods, and why they work. And of course it should be able to not just explain why, but actually prove they work by showing the results. 24.57.210.141 (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Chemistry.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080512083126/http://chemistrygreatdebate.spaces.live.com/ to http://ChemistryGreatDebate.spaces.live.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)