Talk:Chesham Grammar School

Disambiguation
There is a link to Development on this page that is linking to a disambiguation page. I'm not sure which (if any) of the more specific pages on types of development would be a better link in this context. The sentence that has the word isn't very clear. Is it referring to the development of the school (expansion, which is covered in the next sentence), or was there a large housing development built in the area? Could someone please review the choices available and either re-direct the link or delete it? Thanks. &mdash; Chidom   talk   22:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

It is referring to a large development of the school, not a housing development in the area. CHS was a work in progress for many years - I started there in 1976 and there were still many classrooms that were old Horsa huts.

I'm new to all this so I don't really know how to edit pages.

Oh, and I believe Tim Andrew is no longer headteacher as he's retiring/now retired.

--Kateab 13:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It looks like someone has altered the link so it no longer points to a disambiguation page, although I'm not convinced a link adds any value in the intended context. It looks like Tim Andrew retires at the end of August, and that his successor, Philip Wayne, takes over in September, so the information is still currently correct. - Scribble Monkey 14:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Censorship
There's something clearly wrong with this section. It needs sources, or it should be removed. Sure, it's a bit of fun to say "this secion has often been removed by suspected school employees", but it isn't meaningful (and no, I do not and have never worked for the school!). Estesark (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's silliness, and I've removed the section again. Joyous! | Talk 17:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

To 86.130.236.75: "IT staff and technicians have confirmed this" is not justification enough for inclusion in the article. The content does not meet Wikipedia's policies/guidelines on Verifiability and Notability. If you disagree, please discuss it here rather than continually reinserting it to the article. Thanks. Estesark (talk) 21:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Removal of "Blog Incident" section
What was the justification for removing this section? Its press coverage granted it some notability, I felt, and it was properly sourced. Please clarify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Estesark (talk • contribs) 10:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Undid a lot of distorted facts by vandals
This really needs to be watched. Is it possible for this school to have 1300000 school children? Oneelephantpickle (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Chesham Grammar School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060803055309/http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/specialistschools/ to http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/specialistschools/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131228202523/http://www.cheshamgrammar.bucks.sch.uk:80/assets/files/Admissions%20Policy%202014.pdf to http://www.cheshamgrammar.bucks.sch.uk/assets/files/Admissions%20Policy%202014.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150615110436/http://www.cheshamgrammar.bucks.sch.uk/assets/files/Information%20Evening%20Herts.pdf to http://www.cheshamgrammar.bucks.sch.uk/assets/files/Information%20Evening%20Herts.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110912082919/http://www.global-fellowship.org/default.aspx?page=2 to http://www.global-fellowship.org/default.aspx?page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)