Talk:Chiang Mai International School

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Victuallers 21:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campus buildings[edit]

Hi all,

I removed the Campus section. It was simply a list of buildings (such as "Gymnasium") and read more like a brochure than a relevant section. baconbits (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History and Presbyterian Church investigation[edit]

This part is both relevant, noteworthy, and sourced. There have been several accounts that have removed this throughout the years, either without sufficient explanation or any explanation at all.

Please refrain from removing relevant text without a strong reason. baconbits (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The current treatment does seem rather shoehorned in and lacking proper context though. It would be a good idea to expand the section with other relevant content to avoid WP:UNDUE focus over a single negative aspect. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Would you recommend creating a section for it? Although it would be a short one. baconbits (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit concerned that might result in further over-emphasis of the issue. May be better to wait until more content is developed. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]