Talk:Child marriage

Lead sentence description of the topic
Per this edit, there seems to be an opinion that the MOS:LEADSENTENCE should not include marriage between children within the definition of the topic. Marriage between children is something that occurs frequently in some cultures – for example, in some parts of India. For me, it is difficult to understand why such marriages should not be discussed in this article. The article already includes some discussion of this, with a relevant photo near the top of the article and another photo further down showing marriages between children, so why should it not be included in the opening topic description? If the marriages between children are out of scope, should we remove some of that content from the article? Should there be a hatnote with a link to some other article about marriages between children? I notice that the cited UNICEF source defines child marriage as "any formal marriage or informal union between a child under the age of 18 and an adult or another child." I think that should suffice to justify including marriage between children in the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * BarrelProof, if you haven't already, see what was discussed in the section above. The vast majority of child marriages are not between children. So regarding this, this and this? "Between children" should not be placed before "between a child and an adult." Furthermore, there is currently nothing in the article about marriages between children. You mentioned the images. See what is stated above about the images as well. And regarding your "where the age of eighteen is typically used as the threshold for adulthood" wording? It made it seem that it's only child marriage when the age of eighteen is used as the threshold for adulthood. It was just odd wording.
 * Zero0000, given what was stated about age 18 in the "Rights" section above and that age 18 is given as the age in sources on child marriage, I question you removing age 18 from the lead sentence. Yes, age 18 is covered in the second paragraph, but I have yet to see any sources give some other age for the matter. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't really care whether marriages between children are mentioned before or after mentioning marriages that include one adult and one child. What I disliked is that the entire possibility of both parties being children was missing completely and was rapidly removed when I added it. To some degree, I think the possibility of both parties being children is implicit in various places in the article, even if it is not discussed explicitly. For example, there is a paragraph about child grooms. While it may be theoretically possible that all those child grooms have been marrying adult women, I think it's highly unlikely. There are also places that refer to "male" or "groom" rather than "man" or "boy", such that the language would apply regardless. The article shouldn't consider only what is most common and neglect all other possibilities. It is still fairly common for children to be married off to each other by pre-set family arrangements in some places (for example, the current Prime Minister of India became engaged at around age 4 and had a shaadi ceremony of marriage at around age 13, and his wife is a year-and-a-half younger than he is, see this article about that – click "View as Single Page" and search for "shaadi"). —BarrelProof (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't state or imply that "The article shouldn't consider only what is most common and neglect all other possibilities.", but we must keep WP:Due weight in mind. And we should at least not include a significant detail in the lead if it's not also coveted lower; this is per WP:Lead. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * By the way here is a third picture used in the article that depicts a marriage between children, and here is a fourth one, and here is a fifth one. I think it should be generally well understood that some of the marriages of underage boys that are discussed in the article have involved underage girls. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I just read that discussion. Thanks for pointing that out. I hadn't noticed it. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The age 18 comes from the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). That's why it dominates recent studies. Studies of the historical phenomenon of child marriage nearly always focus on younger children. I could easily give a dozen sources that don't use 18 as a criterion, for the simple reason that in many historical societies (including European) the number 18 would define a large fraction of all marriages as child marriages thereby making the concept useless. I propose adding to the lead paragraph a sentence like "The age at which a child becomes an adult was defined to be 18 by the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child." (I believe this can be sourced to at least one of the sources in ref 1.) Zerotalk 02:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Zero0000, we should be using up-to-date sources on this matter. In no way does historical usage trump what is current. That is the reason why we have "History" sections. 18 is WP:Due and no other ages are given in the literature. I don't see that we should add "The age at which a child becomes an adult was defined to be 18 by the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child." It certainly shouldn't be in the lead sentence. That would just make people think that age 18 is the only adult threshold with regard to child marriage. In the aforementioned discussion, we were clear about using "typically" since the age of majority and marriageable age is age 18 in the vast majority of countries...but not all.


 * Crossroads, thoughts? Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * This article is not only or even primarily about history, so we are not bound by historians' use of those words when studying the past to distinguish from the then-common practice of marriage right after puberty. The primary topic is the practice itself, and by far the bulk of the article is about its nature in the present. If those sources typically use age 18 as the basis for their definition, then we can say "typically" regarding age 18 in the lead sentence or paragraph. Crossroads -talk- 03:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't have enough interest in this article to argue, but you are both wrong. "We should be using up-to-date sources on this matter" — up-to-date sources study things that happened in the past as well as in the present; defining the subject from the beginning as something that often makes no sense when considering the past is bad article writing, especially when it is so easy to avoid. "No other ages are given in the literature" – you are ignorant of the literature. "Marriageable age is age 18 in the vast majority of countries" — not even true, see that article (female with parental consent: 84 less than 18, 95 equal to 18, 8 greater than 18). "This article is not only or even primarily about history" — I never said it was. Zerotalk 06:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It's not at all wrong to state that we should be using up-to-date sources to define/relay what child marriage means today. Historical usage is historical usage. We wouldn't define a topic by a historical usage for any topic on Wikipedia if that historical usage is no longer how the matter is defined/what the concept is today. The same goes for articles on words, where we relay what that word means today before talking about what it used to mean. We report on historical usage, but that's not defining the topic by it.


 * You stated that I am "ignorant of the literature" for stating that "No other ages are given in the literature." I'm not. If it's true that I am, you should be able to point to academic sources giving an age other than age 18 when defining child marriage.


 * You stated that it's not true that marriageable age is age 18 in the vast majority of countries. You pointed me to the Marriageable age article, as if I hadn't looked at that article before. The lead of that article currently states, "That age is most commonly 18, but there are variations, some higher and some lower." Scrolling through the article the "By country" section of the article, I see age 18 given significantly more than other ages. I concede that "most commonly" is not automatically the same thing as "vast majority." But whether or not "vast majority" applies to marriageable age, it most certainly applies to age of majority...and I did state "age of majority and marriageable age." Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 02:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * A child age wedding tradition in Bihar uneducated society.jpg

"A additionnal verse that prove child marriage that is missing in this article"
A lot of quran only ( 100% quranist or just muslim who are rejecting some hadith will oppose you that the 65:4 didnt explicitly talk about child so they will tell you that the quran is actually talking about mature women who didnt menstruate yet and will reject all the tafsir( and even some hadith) since they are just regular "human" that can make mistakes.

But I have found a verse to prove child marriage DIRECTLY :

23. Forbidden for you are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your paternal aunts, your maternal aunts, your brother's daughters, your sister's daughters, your foster-mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives' mothers, and your stepdaughters in your guardianship—born of wives you have gone into—but if you have not gone into them, there is no blame on you. And the wives of your genetic sons, and marrying two sisters simultaneously. Except what is past. God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

so here in this verse the quran CLEARLY makes hallal to marry your "stepdaughter which you have in charge " You wouldnt have here in charge if she was a mature women.

I think muslims critics should add this verse to their arsenal even muslim quran only or who are rejecting all the bad hadith cant respond to that. This is the first time I use wiki I am not sure If I this is the right place and the right manner to provide you this proof But please think about adding  this verse to this very good article that made me questioning my faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:3E9:A260:393F:4B75:9279:4294 (talk) 12:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

bride kidnapping
The section on bride kidnapping doesn't demonstrate its relevance to this page. A kidnapped bride could be young or old, but nothing is said about that. It needs a source connecting it to child marriage or it should be removed. Zerotalk 10:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Fixing an Error
I get it. You guys clearly don’t want people to know about other sources, but what Mordechai A. Friedman said in his book. I can’t say he is wrong, but most sources that I read on Jewish marriage contradict what he said. The sources I’ve read said most married at teen years or early to mid or mid or mid to late or early to late. None said before 15. Some point out that Palestinian Jewish women typically married in mid to late teen years while those in Babylon married earlier. Several sources said Palestinian Jewish women married 12-18. 2601:406:5101:F500:8889:EF3D:51CD:601B (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)