Talk:China National Space Administration

questions that one could try to find the answers to
If anyone out there wants to play amateur CIA analyst. Here is your chance. Much of the information on this page is probably wrong. Here are some questions that one could try to find the answers to:


 * I've added some snippets from CNSA's website. -Wikibob | Talk 20:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)


 * What is the relationship between CNSA, COSTIND, or the State Science and Technology Commission or the China Academy of Sciences. It's not clear to me if CNSA is directly under the State Council or if it is under COSTIND.  That makes a big difference because if it is under COSTIND, it has a much higher military flavor than SSTC or under the State Council?


 * CNSA states: "The Ninth NPC assigned CNSA as an internal structure of the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense (COSTIND)."


 * What are the actual powers of CNSA? Is it mainly a liason agency like the Ministry of National Defense or does it have any real power?


 * What can we find out about the staff of CNSA?


 * resumes of the current Administrators


 * What is the relationship between the civilian space program and the People's Liberation Army? My current theory is that the PRC is trying to actively model the Chinese defense industry on the American one.  So the PLA has no direct control or supervision over the civilian space program, but because the PLA and the CNSA both contract to CALT, and CASTC, that civilian and military experience get exchanged back and forth.  My current theory is that one can see the Chinese space program as moving from a Soviet style system to an American one.


 * I'll pass on all the others, but would be interested to see some answers. -Wikibob | Talk 20:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

-- User:Roadrunner

logo
something should be said about the logo. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 10:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I wonder what their inspiration was for this? --Son (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I know im a geek, but jezz it looks allot like the starfleet symbols they use on star trek! MattyC3350 (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Meaning of logo is added. Is a new page for the logo needed? --Playcod (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Shouldn't this say something about the similarity to the Starfleet logo? I realize there is a real explanation, but it really DOES look like the same one. I've heard alot of people talk about it, and I think it should at least be mentioned. 82.245.57.172 (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I also think it should be noted that the CNSA logo is basically a cross between the logos for the United Federation of Planets and Starfleet from Star Trek. Jacob1207 (talk) 01:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Requested move (2010)

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

China National Space Administration → CNSA — Common name, like NASA. Bashibazoukisback (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC) we could move "China National Space Administration" to "CNSA" like the NASA article. CNSA is a more common name. Lunaroutpost (talk) 13:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose CNSA is not a well-known abbreviation in the English language.- choster (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Unlike NASA, the China National Space Administration is not predominately known as CNSA.--Labattblueboy (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose A simple redirect from CNSA to this page would work, seeing as its not very well known by its short form.-- Navy Blue84  14:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose We have enough pages with acronyms as titles as it is. While the acronym may be familiar to those in the field, the vast majority of readers won't have a clue what CNSA is.  Skinsmoke (talk) 16:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Note also that NASA is sometimes said aloud as a word ("Nasa") rather than as a string of letters ('n', 'a', 's', 'a'). Surely that's not true for CNSA? (sdsds - talk) 19:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on China National Space Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228194440/http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n615709/n620681/n771918/index.html to http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n615709/n620681/n771918/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923205103/http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n360696/n361228/n361378/513487.html to http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n360696/n361228/n361378/513487.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090627025632/http://www.spacechina.com/qywh_qysbxt_sjsbxt.shtml to http://www.spacechina.com/qywh_qysbxt_sjsbxt.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Logo Related to US Air Force Space Command Logo?
The Chinese logo looks awfully reminiscent of the logo of the US Air Force Space Command. Any relation?--Zulu, King Of The Dwarf People (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Wang Yaping.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Fei Junlong.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * CNSA logo 2.jpg

Requested move 17 July 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 16:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

China National Space Administration → CNSA – Suggesting this move per Ngram (also WP:COMMONNAME). — AKSHADĒV™  talk  11:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose already a primary redirect, no benefit from acronymizing In ictu oculi (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:ACRONYMTITLE. Abbreviations are not names, and should be used as article titles only in rare cases where the topic is known almost exclusively by its acronym. Station1 (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment ISRO (the India equivalent) was moved to the acronymtitle recently, is this move related? -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 02:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Kind of inspired I would say, but according to MOS:ACROTITLE, it doesn't make any sense to move an article if the topic is not known exclusively by its acronym. I completely agree with Station1. — AKSHADĒV™  talk  06:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If you agree why is the nomination still open? Randy Kryn (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Because I don't have the authority to close it, simple as that. — AKSHADĒV™  talk  12:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose, maybe if this were Chinese Wikipedia but in the English version the full name is the most recognizable. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)