Talk:Chloe Mitchell/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Review
✅ everything so far. Thankyou for taking on the review! — Ar  re  03:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you're going to list the previous child actors in the "portrayed by" parameter, then a caption is needed for the image. "Elizabeth Hendrickson as Chloe Fisher".
 * "After brief marriages to Cane and then Billy, Chloe begins an unsuccessful streak of relationships with men including: Chance Chancellor (John Driscoll), Ronan Malloy (Jeff Branson), and most recently Kevin Fisher (Greg Rikaart)." Remove the ":", no need.
 * I believe the correct linking for John Driscoll is John Driscoll (actor). Fix all the links to that name.
 * TV Guide's Nelson Branco --> Nelson Branco of TV Guide
 * "Katherine Tina Valentine was introduced by then-executive producer" --> former executive producer
 * Unlink Elizabeth Hendrickson in the casting section.
 * Put "Y&R" and "AMC" in italics (in the quote in the casting section).
 * "Hendrickson was pleased that the writers decided to give Chloe a backstory," add something like "saying:" to the end of that.
 * "Hendrickson compared their relationship, which ensued as a result of Chloe practically "threatening him", to the psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction (1987)" --> "to the 1987 psychological thriller film Fatal Attraction".
 * "Billy Abbott (Billy Millor)" --> I'm assuming "Millor" was a typo? It's spelt "Miller".
 * "However, the marriage and romance was prematurely ended to pave the way for the reunion between Billy and his highschool sweetheart Mac Browning (Clementine Ford)". Change "highschool" to "high school".
 * "and mob princess Angelina Veneziano's (Diana DeGarmo) intense crush on Kevin (Which leads to a brief marriage, with Angelina's mob father threatening to kill Kevin if he doesn't wed his daughter)" --> "Which" should be with a lower case w.
 * Remove redundancy of "A writer from Zap2it" in reception. Just say "They wrote,".
 * Considering how the "in popular culture" section consists of just one fact, I would suggest merging it into reception somehow.
 * Overall, these concerns need to be addressed before the review can go any further. Once they have been, I will return to pass/fail the article. Cheers, --Brick House 337 19:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Final GA review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Fairly well covered as far as focus.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Overall, the article is in good article condition. I don't see any further issues that need to be addressed. Pass. --Brick House 337 04:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thankyou so much Brick House, for the review, and for making it so fast as usual. Much love!— Ar  re  04:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Overall, the article is in good article condition. I don't see any further issues that need to be addressed. Pass. --Brick House 337 04:03, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thankyou so much Brick House, for the review, and for making it so fast as usual. Much love!— Ar  re  04:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thankyou so much Brick House, for the review, and for making it so fast as usual. Much love!— Ar  re  04:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)