Talk:Chlorarachniophyte

COMMENTS
Was the origin of the chlorarachniophyte chloroplast really from a euglenoid? This would imply that there was another symbiosis after the incorporation of a chlorophyte into a euglenoid. Was there not a common ancestor? The referenced article seems to imply so:
 * Rhizaria and Excavata (jointly cabozoa) are probably sisters if the formerly green algal plastid of euglenoids and chlorarachneans (Cercozoa) was enslaved in a single event in their common ancestor.

It also talks about how it can't be proven that there wasn't two independent symbiosis events; nowhere (that I can see) does it mention that euglenoid symbiosis was prior to a further chlorarachnian symbiosis. I think I'm going to remove this for just now until that's clarified.
 * - Dackerts (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Removing it is fine. You can also add it in as C-S's hypothesis if it is supported elsewhere and it's one where he hasn't changed it. --Kleopatra (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Chlorarachniophyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110720054024/http://comenius.susqu.edu/bi/202/RHIZARIA/CERCOZOAE/Chlorarachniophyta/default.htm to http://comenius.susqu.edu/bi/202/RHIZARIA/CERCOZOAE/Chlorarachniophyta/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Sourcecheck).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)