Talk:Christine Anderson

Nonsense guilty by association smear
Look, lots of politicians have their picture taken with other politicians. This is normal. It does not mean that they support of even like the people they meet with. Trudeau has had his picture taken with Putin. Does that make him a Putin supporter? Trump has had his picture taken with the dictator of North Korea. Does that make him a communist? Doug Ford has had his picture taken with Trudeau. Does that make them besties? This is clearly not of Encyclopedic value whatsoever. This German politician has surely had her picture taken with thousands of people. Should we list them all? What sheer and utter nonsense is this? 208.98.222.112 (talk) 23:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The article doesn't attempt to convince people of an opinion. It is simple a notable event regarding this person, and is worth mentioning. Ilovecats516 (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we could come to some kind of middle ground by reducing that paragraph to a single sentence? I'm unsure about the notability of this "controversy" and whether it truly exists or not, googling "Chrstine Anderson Controversy" only has one or two sources about this- As well as this, the event is still very very recent; if it becomes more significant and notable as time goes on, it makes sense to include it, but at the moment I don't really think it does deserve the entire paragraph. tla 02:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Almost Totally Gaslighting
This article appears to be recently edited to only project some Canadian based SJW agenda. There is minimal pertinent and factual information, and maximal gaslighting. Altogether, it seriously degrades Wiki credibility.

187.143.54.13 (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2023 (UTC) baden k.

Normal people view Anderson as a defender of human rights and freedoms. 2001:569:F947:4B00:8DD5:7CE7:E24B:E02A (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Telling the world that COVID-19 was created and used as a test to see how compliant people would be, is not rational, nor true in any way. It's this kind of psychobabble that has gotten millions killed in the last few years. Those who speak like her are the ones dying and causing others to die. No one has the right to wilfully spread deadly diseases because they think wearing masks or getting vaccines are a method to control the masses. Measles is coming back, and polio will be next, if people don't grow up and stop believing in ignorant conspiracies more than they value lives. 104.243.181.224 (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)