Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 11:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Will hit this up soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@

GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Broad in coverage. Covers multiple aspects of the subject.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. No vandalism from what I can tell.

6. Two fair use images, one CC image. The former two have proper usage rationales.

Lead
-Could you define in greater depth what a "Cid" is in the lead, aka what it does/means in the series context?
 * Expanded with more info here and in the design info.

Concept and creation
-Section looks good.

Appearances
-Section looks good.

Promotion and reception
-"characters like Cindy represented the rougher edges of a title that went through a troubled development." How so? -I feel the use of "titillate" may be confusing due to its status as a more niche word. I'd change it, though you can leave it if you feel it best. -Overall looks fine. I've made some touch-ups for minor fixes such as typos and such in places.
 * Fixed with a small rewrite, should hopefully be clearer.
 * Put quotes around titillate as it's an exact quote, and tried to make clearer.

Overall
Article looks good overall. Just touch on these points and I'll be happy to pass this article.
 * All should be fixed, let me know if there's anything else to tidy!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Looks good! Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)