Talk:Citywest

Evidence that this is "a village or suburb"
As this seems prima facie untrue. But even if the main promoter of this thesis was a top geographer, WP does not work on opinion. Please provide two supporting citations, or the implication that a business park is a suburb has to come out. For now, as someone mentions in the edit history, looks like Personal Opinion or at best claimed Original Research. 83.241.234.2 (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Nah. It is actually prima facie true. Please provide two supporting citations that it isn't a suburb or stop being a pest. Sarah777 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Wrong, POV test applies to assertions, default is not stating unproven things. So, since no citations have been provided, challenge is automatically upheld, out it comes. 83.241.234.2 (talk) 14:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Nah. It is actually prima facie true. The assertion is the claim that that it isn't a suburb. Sarah777 (talk) 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Eight years on - Citywest is not just a suburb - but now a thriving, growing suburb! Sarah777 (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)