Talk:ClariS

WP:Japan Assessment Commentary
The article was assessed B-class, but narrowly. The information about their names as pseudonyms needs to be included in the Lead section. I'm a little surprised there's not even information on their birthdays. What is the stated need for anonymity? Age & high school? It all sounds pretty manufactured, but I suppose that speculation even from a "reliable source" would be inadmissible. Still, it would be impossible for two high school girls to attend a regular school, where they would be expected to attend club activities, and carry on a career to the extent this groups has. Last, most articles on musical groups include a section on "Critical reception". This article mentions chart rating and gold album, from which one can infer their popularity, but the article would benefit from critical quotes on style, sound, etc. Good luck. Boneyard90 (talk) 12:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

10th anniversary
I'd likely base this claim on obviousness, but the group's been there for 10 years; and thinking of members focusing on their high school studies as a reason of their choice of anonymity doesn't make sense these days. So I removed that claim on my recent update of this article... DJ Baguio (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Seems like someone revised my recent contribution and used a more reliable reference. But the format is still the same, still excluding the claim of "high school duties make them decide their anonymity"... DJ Baguio (talk) 01:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)