Talk:Claribel Alegría

Revert
This is the information i reverted. The information looks like copywright, not to mention the editor (User:Villatin) deleted all previous information to add it. It is not wiki-style. There are elements in which can be used in the article. LaNicoya 21:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Big Edit
About this edit: it was unsourced and seemed copy righted. I dont want to risk it, so I removed it. Brusegadi 13:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow, i though i had removed that a LONG time ago. I removed it for the same reason, it looked like a copyright infringement. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•  LaNicoya 13:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Claribel Alegría. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070417074301/http://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni:80/2005/10/28/nacionales/4432 to http://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni/2005/10/28/nacionales/4432
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070221042450/http://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni:80/2006/11/26/cultural/34848 to http://www.elnuevodiario.com.ni/2006/11/26/cultural/34848

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Too many categories
Alegria is in an excessive amount of categories. We need to find ways to get things under control here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Please slow down. I've spent all afternoon reverting your category removals. Mason (talk) 03:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)