Talk:Clarke v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Developments[edit]

How should the developments to the case, such as the legislature attempting to pass their "99%" alterations of Evers' proposed maps, the report filed by Dr. Grofman & Dr. Cervas, and responses filed by various involved and separate parties, as well as the subpoena request from the legislature, be handled on the page? Should there be further sections to the article, or would this better be discussed/written into the Redistricting in Wisconsin page? Talthiel (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]