Talk:Collotype

[Untitled]
The last paragraph is simply incorrect. It describes not collotype, but collagraph. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collagraphy). I have deleted it. Ian (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collotype. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130213104006/http://brevetsphotographiques.fr/englishluisnadeau.htm to http://brevetsphotographiques.fr/englishluisnadeau.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Changes
I added a Historical Background to the page. I added what I saw was not present in the article at the time of adding to the article. TKilta (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Possible incorrect fact?
In the Historical Background section it's mentioned that "Collotype" was invented in 1855, yet the MoMa alleges that it has a sample of collotype from 1851.

I reached out to MoMA to see what their theories were regarding this item, but due to the pandemic, they're unable to examine the object in person. I'll follow up with them again in the future and will post any relevant information. Thellomerca (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)