Talk:Cone sisters

ref name "shoppers"
The ref name shoppers points nowhere. I'm not sure what it is referencing, but one of them needs to have a ref tage setup like this:

Hope that helps. §tepshep  •   ¡Talk to me!  19:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, it did help. I tracked it down and there was unexplained removal of referenced material. The reference of "shoppers" was also then removed. Replaced material since it is referenced and the accompaning reference of "shoppers" used for multiple footnotes. --Doug talk 21:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protection of this new article
I believe this article should be semi-protected from this much vandalism. How do we go about this?--Doug talk 20:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Semi-protection was requested and granted by Bovlb. I added the protection template.  Enigma  msg! 21:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --Doug talk 21:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Cone sisters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141019145733/http://www.artbma.org/collection/overview/cone.html to http://www.artbma.org/collection/overview/cone.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141019145733/http://www.artbma.org/collection/overview/cone.html to http://www.artbma.org/collection/overview/cone.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
This article is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)