Talk:Confederate Monument of Bowling Green

Lithography
The phrasing of "A lithograph of a painting popular in the Reconstruction-South, Henry Mosler's "Lost Cause", which typified the devastation Northern invaders inflicted upon Southern homesteads, was placed on the front of the monument. Different reliefs are on other sides of the monument" concerns me, as it implies that the lithograph was an original part ofthe monument. However, if the monument was erected in 1876, and lithography was invented in 1890, then it's not a lithograph, or it's not original. Has anyone got any thoughts on this? Geoffrey Pruitt (talk) 17:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * My history specialty is U.S History prior to 1877, so I'm not totally up on the history of lithographs. Maybe it was an early form of lithograph, before they were called as such.-- Bedford  18:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Formatting
Rearranged content. Created two sub sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyjosephwood (talk • contribs) 05:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confederate Monument of Bowling Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516071531/http://www.themorris.org/art/highlights/mosler_lostcause.html to http://www.themorris.org/art/highlights/mosler_lostcause.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)