Talk:Conjunctive adverb

Groupings
For my own notes, I quickly divvied them up as follows:


 * time or sequence


 * meanwhile
 * now
 * then
 * next
 * finally
 * currently
 * eventually
 * henceforth
 * subsequently
 * thereafter


 * place


 * elsewhere


 * to continue


 * further
 * furthermore
 * moreover


 * consequently


 * thus
 * hence
 * therefore
 * consequently


 * contrast


 * comparatively
 * contrarily
 * conversely


 * non-contrast


 * equally
 * likewise
 * similarly


 * conviction


 * certainly
 * indeed
 * undoubtedly


 * emphasis and example


 * notably
 * namely


 * dis-emphasis


 * incidentally


 * quibble


 * although
 * rather


 * quibble buttressed


 * otherwise


 * quibble rejected


 * still
 * nevertheless
 * nonetheless


 * others


 * wherein
 * instead

Perhaps we shouldn't be supplying just a naked, unstructured list. &mdash; MaxEnt 00:51, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * this list is better than that in the article IMO but it still doesn't include 'however', which seems to fit the definition Chrismorey (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Other CAs
Other sources I've looked at seem to agree that 'however' and 'therefore' are conjunctive adverbs, and this seems to make sense, so I've added them. However, I'm not a trained grammarian so if this upsets you, revert it! Chrismorey (talk) 03:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Confusion in this entry
I find this entry to be full of confusing or inaccurate information. For example, it lists "because" as a conjunctive adverb, which I believe is inaccurate. "Because" is a subordinating conjunction. The easiest way to distinguish between a subordinating conjunction and a conjunctive adverb is that you cannot make a complete sentence (grammatically speaking) if you take a short sentence and put a subordinating conjunction at the beginning. For example, take "It was raining." Add "because" (a subordinating conjunction) and you don't get a clause that can stand alone grammatically: "Because it was raining" is not a grammatically complete sentence. Add "however" (a conjunctive adverb) and you do get a clause that can stand alone grammatically: "However, it was raining." Wikipedia has a clear entry on subordinating conjunctions and lists "because" among them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_(grammar)#Subordinating_conjunctions This entry also lists "yet" as an example, although "yet" is a coordinating conjunction, not a conjunctive adverb. Also, this entry contains a lot of unsourced opinion, such as "As a result, transmission of incomplete grammatical understanding within American colleges has created increasingly obtuse academic prose and deceptive public usage during the past fifty years." This entry on conjunctive adverbs needs a serious overhaul. Jk180 (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Untitled (July 2018)
This page is ENTIRELY INACCURATE with respect to the definition of "conjunctive adverb" found in the dictionary and commonly taught in American grammar textbooks.

The following are SUBORDINATING CONJUNCTIONS (not conjunctive adverbs): if when whereas although because

Their function is to subordinate one clause to another. Yes, the result of adding a subordinating conjunction to a clause is to create an adverbial clause, which serves as an adverb modifying a word (typically the verb) in the other clause. For example, the sub clause in the following modifies the verb "run" in the independent clause:

When the sun rises, I run three miles.

However, the fact that "When the sun rises" is an adverbial clause does NOT make "when" a conjunctive adverb.

The following are CONJUNCTIVE ADVERBS: therefore however subsequently [I believe]

These adverbs do not subordinate one clause to another. They show a relationship between two independent clauses. (I acknowledge that their precise grammatical function is a little tricky—if they are adverbs, then where is the verb, adjective, or adverb they are modifying? I am not sure that they meet this criterion for "adverb." A little more research, though, should clarify.)

In the following example, the conjunctive adverb "therefore" indicates that the idea expressed in one independent clause is the logical consequence of the idea expressed in the other.

Socrates is mortal; therefore, he will eventually perish.

However, both clauses in the example are independent clauses; neither is now an adverb clause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anothercountryheardfrom1000 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * You say of “When the sun rises, I run three miles.” that “the fact that "When the sun rises" is an adverbial clause does NOT make "when" a conjunctive adverb.”


 * Why not? Loraof (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)