Talk:Constance Kamii

Reason for PROD removal
Prod concern stated as "Article started as a puffy piece and was turned into a resume--with a complete lack of secondary sources, and thus no suggestion she passes PROF, and no indication of inherent notability, this should be deleted." The subject of this article has written several highly cited books, and it seems highly likely to me that she does meet WP:NACADEMIC. Deletion of this article is certainly not uncontroversial - it could easily be improved and properly referenced. A quick look at the history shows that a lot of information has been deleted which could be usefully returned and revised. RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)