Talk:Constructive empiricism

"A theory is semantically literal if and only if the language of the theory cannot be reinterpreted in non-theoretical terms without some change in meaning." - Can the author of this article be more precise? I had a hard time understanding the above sentence. It means if we interpret a theory in observational terms, then we will change the meaning of terms, i.e. that it is impossible for a theoretical term to become an observational one without change in meaning- right? Who says the contray? that thanks

---I agree that as originally written it didn't make much sense; I've fixed it. (FYI I wasn't the original writer.) --BJM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.2.210 (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constructive empiricism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927035151/http://journal.ilovephilosophy.com/Article/In-Defence-of-van-Fraassen/140 to http://journal.ilovephilosophy.com/Article/In-Defence-of-van-Fraassen/140

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:51, 12 August 2017 (UTC)