Talk:Contempt of the sovereign

Reversion
The 2012 article is a complete misdescription of the doctrine. There are essentially no sources so it is impossible to verify the information or understand why the concept has been so badly misrepresented. It seems to simply be a poor reading of Halsbury. I will revert back to Monday's version unless some explanation or justification is given for keeping it in this sorry state. Catobonus (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Essentially no sources, except Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, the leading criminal practitioners' textbook. You can verify it there. Richard75 (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)