Talk:Convention of Scutari

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion. The objection raised below seems to be adequately addressed by the proposed addition of a hatnote to the top of the article to avoid confusion. - GTBacchus(talk) 22:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Treaty of Shkodër → Convention of Scutari – per WP:COMMONNAME and USEENGLISH Takabeg (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * "Treaty of Shkodër" -Llc 1 ?
 * "Treaty of Scutari" -Llc 1
 * 1862 "Convention of Scutari" -Llc minimum 27

Oppose Scutari also refers to Üsküdar, an intracity district of İstanbul. That definition is vastly more popular than Shkoder. Since this article deals with a treaty involving the Ottoman Empire the reader may visualise an incorrect location. The present title is more informative. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. I understand logic and rational explanation of Nedim Ardoğa and based on that, regardless of the result of this poll, I propose to add a template with link to disambiguation page with other possible meanings of the name of the article. Still, all wikipedia rules which deal with naming conventions :), including Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(government_and_legislation) say something like this: "Prefer titles that reflect the name commonly used in reliable sources." It is obvious that "established, universally agreed-upon common name" used in sources on English language for the topic of this article is "Convention of Scutari". --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.