Talk:Conway criterion

Hexagonal tilings
There may be some hexagonal tilings for examples here: Hexagonal_tiling Tom Ruen (talk) 00:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Questionable use of a golygon
Perhaps the golygon picture should be replaced with a better picture? My only complaints with the golygon picture are that most people don't know what a golygon is and that golygon-(ality?) has nothing to do with the Conway criterion.

104.228.101.152 (talk) 07:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)


 * It's especially confusing to this novice, as the text discusses hexagons but the illustration shows an 8-sided figure. Another element that I found confusing - "each of the boundary parts BC, CD, EF, and FA is centrosymmetric—that is, each one is congruent to itself when rotated by 180-degrees around its midpoint" - isn't any line segment going to be congruent to itself when rotated 180-degrees around its midpoint? Thanks for any clarification. PurpleChez (talk) 18:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conway criterion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120706175448/http://www.mathforamerica.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=11&name=DLFE-103.pdf to http://www.mathforamerica.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=11&name=DLFE-103.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:46, 12 August 2017 (UTC)